Skip to main content

Example Rough Diamonds Report

See what a Rough Diamonds Report looks like

This example was built for one specific company and its context. Every Rough Diamonds Report follows the same method, but the buying situations are built around the company being measured.

Example Rough Diamonds Reports

Rough Diamonds Report

AFAS Software

afas.nl

Market: Netherlands Measured: September 2026

Management Summary

AI has a clear and broad view of AFAS as integrated business software. In the three tested core buying situations, AFAS was strongly recommended and appeared first in the shortlist.

The main differences appear at the edges. AI still strongly recommended AFAS for international expansion, but added conditions around payroll. When the buyer wanted HR and payroll while keeping existing finance, AI left AFAS out.

Start here: decide whether AFAS wants to compete for that narrower HR and payroll need. If yes, investigate whether that fit is clear enough in public information and to AI. There is no urgent correction needed in the tested core situations.

AI Understanding Score

91 / 100

How well the tested AI understands what your company does and who it serves.

90 / 100

How strongly the tested AI recommends your company in relevant buying situations.

How AI understands your company

  • Company type

    AI sees AFAS as broad, integrated business software.

  • What AI connects AFAS with

    AI links AFAS with combined administration, HR and payroll needs.

  • Where the picture changes

    In narrower point-solution needs, AI may see AFAS as a less obvious fit.

Your Recommendation Map

See where AI recommends your company, where it does not, and where the result needs more context.

AI clearly recommends the company in this buying situation.

Integrated administration for professional services

Strong recommendation

Integrated administration for trading companies

Strong recommendation

Construction & project administration with Dutch payroll

Strong recommendation

AI includes the company as a relevant option.

Depends on context

The result depends on a condition, context or specific proposition.

Dutch HR & payroll with international expansion

Strong recommendation, with conditions around international payroll

Not mentioned

The company did not appear in the AI shortlist. Read the note to see what this means.

HR & payroll while keeping existing finance

AI left AFAS outside the shortlist. Whether that exclusion is appropriate is unclear.

Outside this need

This buying need is outside the company's clear fit.

Standalone sales CRM

Clear outside-fit for this buying need

What you should know

  1. AI sees AFAS as a broad suite

    AI consistently sees AFAS as broad, integrated business software. This works well in the tested core buying situations.

  2. International growth adds conditions, not rejection

    AI still recommends AFAS strongly when international expansion becomes relevant. It adds conditions around payroll outside the Netherlands.

  3. A narrower HR and payroll need gives a different result

    When the buyer wants HR and payroll but keeps existing finance, AI leaves AFAS out. This may be a real boundary or a narrow AI view. This report cannot tell which.

What next?

Decide if the narrower HR and payroll market matters

First decide if AFAS wants to win buyers who keep their current finance system but replace HR and payroll.

If yes, check whether that fit is clear in public information and to AI. If no, no change is needed.

Check how international payroll is explained

Make sure it is clear what AFAS supports directly, what uses local processors or partners, and what customers should expect when expanding abroad.

The report does not show that the current explanation is wrong or unclear.

Leave the tested core positioning alone for now

AFAS was first and strongly recommended in three core buying situations.

Do not create work just because a report exists. There is no urgent visibility problem in those tested situations.

Buying situations in detail

Integrated administration for professional services Strong recommendation Strongly recommended

Buyer need

Business software to run finance, people, payroll and projects together.

AI result

AFAS was ranked first and strongly recommended.

Also mentioned

Exact, Peple

Integrated administration for trading companies Strong recommendation Strongly recommended

Buyer need

One administrative environment for orders, invoicing, relationships and HR.

AI result

AFAS was ranked first and strongly recommended.

Also mentioned

Odoo, Exact, Microsoft

Construction & project administration with Dutch payroll Strong recommendation Strongly recommended

Buyer need

Project administration, purchasing, invoicing and Dutch payroll.

AI result

AFAS was ranked first and strongly recommended in this buying situation.

Also mentioned

Exact, 4PS

Dutch HR & payroll with international expansion Strong recommendation, with conditions around international payroll Depends on context

Buyer need

HR and payroll software that covers the Netherlands now and may later cover several EU countries.

AI result

AFAS remained first and strongly recommended when international expansion was introduced.

Why it matters

The tested AI added conditions around international payroll and the possible use of local processors or partners.

Also mentioned

Nmbrs, SD Worx, ADP, Loket

HR & payroll while keeping existing finance AI left AFAS outside the shortlist. Whether that exclusion is appropriate is unclear. Not mentioned

Buyer need

Software for personnel files, leave and Dutch payroll, beside the existing financial administration.

AI result

The tested AI left AFAS outside the shortlist.

Why it matters

AI linked AFAS mainly with broader suite standardisation. This report does not show whether that exclusion was correct.

Also mentioned

Employes, Buddee, Nmbrs, Loket

Standalone sales CRM Clear outside-fit for this buying need Outside this need

Buyer need

A dedicated CRM for pipeline, campaigns and forecast, beside the existing finance and HR systems.

AI result

AFAS did not appear when the buyer wanted a dedicated sales CRM while keeping finance and HR elsewhere.

Why it matters

This is a clear outside-fit for this buying need.

Also mentioned

HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Microsoft

About this report

This report is a snapshot. It shows how one tested AI responded to a limited set of buying situations in the selected market.

Rough Diamonds separates what AI did from what Rough Diamonds thinks it means. This report is not a market ranking. It does not cover every possible buying situation or AI system.

If a company is not mentioned, that does not always mean it is a poor fit. When the meaning is unclear, the report says so.

"Also mentioned" shows companies that appeared in the same AI answer. It is not a full competitor ranking.

Results can change over time. A different result later does not prove that a website or marketing change caused it.

Built around the company being measured

This example reflects the context of this company. Your Rough Diamonds Report will be built around your own company and the situations that are relevant to it.

Independent by design. The company being measured does not control the test or its result.

Private by default. Your report and scores are not published in the public Benchmark.

What would this look like for your company?